Following are the judgements for all the nominated books under the genre "Most Unique Plot". Before we proceed further, we would like to thank shrav26 for giving unbiased judgements on time. The participants are requested not to unfollow either the community or the judge after the end of the awards as it was a permanent follow which was asked.

We hope that you are satisfied with the reviews and the judgements. Although we have made sure that no malpractice occurs, still if you feel any kind of biasness taking place, you are requested to politely ping us your doubt in the pm.

If you have any questions to be asked from the judge, i.e. shrav26, you can politely comment down your doubts and tag her. She'll reply to your queries asap. Also, all the participants are requested to leave atleast one comment to acknowledge the review.

Before we begin with the reviews, there's this one thing which we all should always keep in mind, that "Participation is the principle of learning." and that, "Winning is something, but participation is everything." We want to encourage all of you to learn and improve with these reviews and come back stronger.

Many many congratulations to all the participants who came forward to showcase their talents. 🎉

Here you go with the reviews.

| W I N N E R |

As the number of slots were 10, there would be three winners, i.e. 1st, 2nd and 3rd.

And the winners for the Most Unique Plot genre are as follows:

(1) "Yaadein" from Ankahe Dastaan by issabella_8 and @anushkaraj020 🙌

(2) "Shuruwaat Dosti Ki" from Ankahe Dastaan by issabella_8 and @anushkaraj020 🙌

(3) "Ummeedein" by Fad_mugs 🙌

Heartiest Congratulations to you all for being winners of the second edition of Suman- Ek Anokha Puruskaar.🥳

Here are the judgements of your books:

(1) Yaadein by issabella_8 & @anushkaraj020

COVER: (9.5/10)
• Creativity- (4.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
TITLE: (7.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (0.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
BLURB: (--/10)
Since it was a standalone chapter from a book, a blurb was not considered.
PROLOGUE: (--/10)
Since it was a standalone chapter from a book, a prologue was not considered.
GRAMMAR: (8.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
• Quality of sentences- (3/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (10/10)
• Uniqueness- (5/5)
• Impact- (3/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (8/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (9/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (72/80) = 90%
The banner made is creative and very attractive as well. It relates to the chapter's storyline too. The title though not unique complements the plot well. The grammatical part of the chapter has a few, but noticeable mistakes. Overall the connectivity of scenes in the chapter is faultless but the flow of sentences could have been done a little more properly.

(2) Shuruwaat Dosti Ki by issabella_8 & @anushkaraj020

COVER: (7.5/10)
• Creativity- (3.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
TITLE: (7.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (1/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (1.5/2)
BLURB: (--/10)
Since it was a standalone chapter from a book, a blurb was not considered.
PROLOGUE: (--/10)
Since it was a standalone chapter from a book, a prologue was not considered.
GRAMMAR: (8.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
• Quality of sentences- (3/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (10/10)
• Uniqueness- (5/5)
• Impact- (3/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (8/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (9/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (70/80) = 87.5%
The banner made is very beautiful and is fairly relatable to the chapter too but not a creative one. The title is a suited one but a very common one. Also, there is a capitalisation mistake in the title- the 'K' in the 'ki' should not be capitalised. The grammatical part of the chapter is good with just 3-4 mistakes. The storyline of the chapter is very unique and executed well too but the flow of sentences could have been made better.

(3) Ummeedein by Fad_mugs

COVER: (6/10)
• Creativity- (1.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
TITLE: (8.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (1.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
BLURB: (8/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (3/3)
• Insight into the book- (2/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1.5/2)
• Power to excite- (1.5/2)
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
A prologue is missing.
GRAMMAR: (9.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4.5/5)
• Quality of sentences- (3/3)
• Punctuation- (2/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (9.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (5/5)
• Impact- (2.5/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (9/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (77/100)= 77%
The cover is really simple, it can be made more creative and attractive. The title is not so unique but relatable to the story. The blurb should have given more insight into the story. Having a prologue and a character sketch is very important, these can be added. The grammatical part is almost perfect. Introduction of all characters could have been done more properly. The overall plot of the story is very unique and set forth properly too.

| O T H E R |
| P A R T I C I P A N T S |

Roke Na Ruke Yeh Pyaar by i_dipansh

COVER: (8.5/10)
• Creativity- (5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (1.5/2)
TITLE: (8/10)
• Uniqueness- (1/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
BLURB: (7.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2/3)
• Insight into the book- (2.5/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1/2)
• Power to excite- (2/2)
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
Prologue was missing
GRAMMAR: (8/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (3.5/5)
• Quality of sentences- (3/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (8/10)
• Uniqueness- (4/5)
• Impact- (2.5/3)
• Execution- (1.5/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (6.5/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (3.5/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (8/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (8/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (72.5/100)
The cover is creative and relatable to the story as well. But, the name of the author written is not visible clearly. The title of the story is not so unique. The blurb is very much to the point and gives a proper insight into the story. A prologue is missing in the story, which has to be added. The grammar is fine, with a few noticeable mistakes. The plot is not very unique. A character sketch is missing and the character introduction could have been done better. The flow of the story is however really good.

Faisla by shambhavisontakke

COVER: (5.5/10)
• Creativity- (2/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (1/2)
TITLE: (8/10)
•Uniqueness- (1/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
BLURB: (6/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (1.5/3)
• Insight into the book- (2/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1/2)
• Power to excite- (1.5/2)
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
Prologue was missing
GRAMMAR: (5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (3/5)
• Quality of sentences- (1.5/3)
• Punctuation- (0.5/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (8.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (5/5)
• Impact- (2/3)
• Execution- (1.5/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7.5/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (3.5/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (8/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4.5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (3.5/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (9/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (67.5/100)
The cover is very simple. It can be made more attractive. Also the title of the story shouldn't have been written in parts in the cover. The title is short, sweet and relatable to the storyline too but a very common one. The blurb gives a proper insight into the story but many capitalisation and grammatical errors can be found. There is no prologue, which has to be added. The grammatical part is good with a few flaws, but there are a lot of punctuation errors. The plot is very unique. A character sketch is missing too. A proper connectivity of sentences is maintained throughout the story.

Love In Pieces by _yesha_jain_

COVER: (9/10)
• Creativity- (5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (1/2)
TITLE: (8.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (2/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (1.5/2)
BLURB: (7.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2/3)
• Insight into the book- (2/3)
• Writing style or flow- (2/2)
• Power to excite- (1.5/2)
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
Prologue is missing
GRAMMAR: (6/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (3/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2/3)
• Punctuation- (1/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (9.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (5/5)
• Impact- (2.5/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7.5/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (3.5/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (7.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4/5)
• Flow of sentences- (3.5/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (9/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (74.5/100)
The cover is very much relatable to the story and creative as well. The name of the author at the base is not clearly visible. The title is relatable to the plot but can be made more creative and attractive. Also, there is an error in the capitalisation of the title, the 'i' in 'in' should not be capitalised. A prologue is missing, which has to be added. Prominent grammatical errors can be noticed along with unnecessary capitalisation of letters in many places. A character sketch is missing though characters are given proper screen space. The flow of the story could have been improved too.

The Groom's Choice by RishikaShrivastava

COVER: (8/10)
• Creativity- (3.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
TITLE: (8.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (2/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
BLURB: (4.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (1/3)
• Insight into the book- (1.5/3)
• Writing style or flow- (0.5/2)
• Power to excite- (1.5/2)
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
Prologue is missing.
GRAMMAR: (5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (2.5/5)
• Quality of sentences- (1/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (8/10)
• Uniqueness- (4.5/5)
• Impact- (2/3)
• Execution- (1.5/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (8.5/10)
• Character sketch- (1.5/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (8/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (8/10)
FOLLOW: (0/10)
TOTAL: (58.5/100)
The cover is relatable to the story but not very creative. The title is fairly different and relatable to the storyline too. The blurb has a lot of noticeable grammatical mistakes and also does not give a proper insight of the story. The story is missing a prologue. In the grammatical part, there are many capitalization and spelling mistakes like 'there' instead of 'their', 'ni' instead of 'nahi', 'jar hu' instead of 'jaa raha hu', etc. The character sketch of the story did not contain any images. Overall the flow of the story was good but the dialogues seemed disconnected at some places.

I can't love you by Doraashi

COVER: (7/10)
• Creativity- (3.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (1.5/2)
TITLE: (6.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (1.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (0.5/2)
BLURB: (6.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2.5/3)
• Insight into the book- (1/3)
• Writing style or flow- (2/2)
• Power to excite- (1/2)
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
Prologue is missing
GRAMMAR: (7.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (3.5/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2.5/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (10/10)
• Uniqueness- (5/5)
• Impact- (3/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (8/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (9/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (73.5/100)
The cover is not very creative. The title is a common one and also not capitalised properly. The blurb does not give an insight into the story. A prologue is missing, which can be added. Prominent punctuation mistakes can be found, which can be rectified. A character sketch can be added. The plot is unique and has been put forward really well.

The Stain by Doraashi

COVER: (9/10)
• Creativity- (4.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
TITLE: (8/10)
• Uniqueness- (1.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
BLURB: (2.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2.5/3)
• Insight into the book- (0/3)
• Writing style or flow- (0/2)
• Power to excite- (0/2)
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
Prologue is missing
GRAMMAR: (8.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4.5/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2.5/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (7/10)
• Uniqueness- (3/5)
• Impact- (2/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (6/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (3/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (7.5/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (68/100)
The cover is simple yet attractive. The title is not so unique and not very relatable to the story too. The blurb neither gives an insight of the story nor does it excite the readers to read it. A proper blurb can be added. A prologue can be added. Character sketch is missing as well. Enough screen space wasn't given to all characters as the story seemed rushed. The plot is not so unique. It might have been when you wrote it, but now there are many stories on the same concept. Also, scenes seemed disconnected at some places.

Lost and found by Doraashi

COVER: (6/10)
• Creativity- (1/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
TITLE: (9/10)
• Uniqueness- (2.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (1.5/2)
BLURB: (6.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2.5/3)
• Insight into the book- (1/3)
• Writing style or flow- (2/2)
• Power to excite- (1/2)
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
Prologue is missing
GRAMMAR: (8/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2.5/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
PLOT & CONCEPT: (9.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (5/5)
• Impact- (2.5/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4.5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (5/5)
OVERALL OPINION: (9/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (74.5/100)
The cover is really simple, it can be made more creative and attractive as well. The title is quite fine and relatable, but could have been more interesting. The blurb is to the point but too short, it could have been made more longer and detailed. A prologue is missing which has to be added. The grammar part is good with a few punctuation errors. A character sketch is missing which can be added too. Overall a notable plot which is well executed and also gives proper justice to the characters.

❢◥ ▬▬▬▬▬▬ ◆ ▬▬▬▬▬▬ ◤❢

We, at FamiliaDeYUDKBH congratulate all the participants and the winners of Most Unique Plot and wish them a brighter future, both on Wattpad and in their lives.

The prizes would be distributed soon. Please check the chapter "Punctuality" to get the timeline of the awards.

Incase of any doubts from the admins, please pm, and incase of any doubts from the judge (shrav26), please comment down and tag her.

Thankyou YUDKBHians.
We await your participation in the next edition as well.❤️