Following are the judgements for all the nominated books under the genre "Best Emotional Plot". Before we proceed further, we would like to thank pahul_gpk for giving unbiased judgements. The participants are requested not to unfollow either the community or the judge after the end of the awards as it was a permanent follow which was asked.

We hope that you are satisfied with the reviews and the judgements. Although we have made sure that no malpractice occurs, still if you feel any kind of biasness taking place, you are requested to politely ping us your doubt in the pm.

If you have any questions to be asked from the judge, i.e. pahul_gpk, you can politely comment down your doubts and tag her. She'll reply to your queries asap. Also, all the participants are requested to leave atleast one comment to acknowledge the review.

Before we begin with the reviews, there's this one thing which we all should always keep in mind, that "Participation is the principle of learning." and that, "Winning is something, but participation is everything." We want to encourage all of you to learn and improve with these reviews and come back stronger.

Many many congratulations to all the participants who came forward to showcase their talents. 🎉

Here you go with the reviews.

| W I N N E R S |

As the number of slots were 10, there would be three winners, i.e. 1st, 2nd and 3rd.

And the winners for the Best Emotional Plot genre are as follows:

(1) "Asli Khushi" from Ankahe Dastaan by issabella_8 and @anushkaraj020 🙌

(2) "Main Tum Pyaar Aur Parivaar" by ishqdinoorhai3  🙌

(3) Tie between "Kash main hota" by Doraashi  and "Tanhayee" by Diku1302 🙌

Heartiest Congratulations to you all for being winners of the second edition of Suman- Ek Anokha Puruskaar.🥳

Here are the judgements of your books:

(1) "Asli Khushi" from Ankahe Dastaan by issabella_8 and @anushkaraj020

COVER: (7.5/10)
• Creativity- (2.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
The banner lacked a lot in creativity. Blends were missing and the font of the title was also very very simple.
TITLE: (7.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (1/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
Ofcourse it's very much relatable to the storyline, but it's way too common. You could have used a very crispy title for such a story which could generate suspense and excitement.
BLURB: (--/10)
Since it is a standalone chapter from a series, a blurb was not required.
PROLOGUE: (--/10)
Since it is a standalone chapter from a series, a prologue was not required.
GRAMMAR: (8/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2.5/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
There were quite a few grammatical and punctuation errors, but otherwise it looked mostly fine.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (9.5/10)
• How emotional is the plot- (5/5)
• Impact- (3/3)
• Execution- (1.5/2)
It was a really very beautiful plot which was carried out amazingly. Everything else was just perfect from the emotions to the impact and even the execution. It just wavered slightly in between.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3.5/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (3.5/4)
As a whole, it didn't give the essence of anything being missing, but when critically reviewed, the introduction of Sameer could have been better and the utilisation just went a little off. Otherwise, it was super amazing.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (8.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)
Both these aspects were near to perfect, but there were just slight instances in between where they wavered a bit. At an instance while shifting from Sameer to Naina's motherhood, it looked that it shifted too suddenly.
OVERALL OPINION: (8/10)
FOLLOW: (5/10)
Since one of the authors have left Wattpad, I could give only half marks for the remaining author.
TOTAL: (61/80) = 76.25%

(2) "Main Tum Pyaar Aur Parivaar" by ishqdinoorhai3

COVER: (1.5/10)
• Creativity- (0/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (1/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (0.5/2)
I would say, there was no cover of this book. I mean, it was a very simple picture, that too was not cut properly. Half of their faces are not visible and you really really need a new cover because the storyline is so beautiful. It feels so bad to give 1.5 to such a strong storyline.
TITLE: (8/10)
• Uniqueness- (1.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (1.5/2)
No doubt it's a very beautiful title which is completely relatable to the storyline. But, it's a very common one. There are 4-5 stories in Samaina category only with the same title.
BLURB: (7.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2/3)
• Insight into the book- (3/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1/2)
• Power to excite- (1.5/2)
Noticeable grammar and punctuation errors here and there, but it gives good insight into the book. However, the writing style could have been better and something more could have been added to excite the readers more as this concept is a bit common.
PROLOGUE: (5.5/10)
• Suspense created- (2/5)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2.5/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1/2)
Since you have written the complete storyline of the story before this sequence and that too in very simple lines, it doesn't really create a good suspense. So it couldn't really give a good impact. Since the storyline is very beautiful, a very impactful blurb could have been written.
GRAMMAR: (7.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (3.5/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2.5/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
There were quite noticeable errors in all the three aspects. I would suggest you to proofread your content.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (9.5/10)
• How emotional is the plot- (5/5)
• Impact- (2.5/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
I don't have much to say about the plot because it was simply one of the best. Though it was a little common, but the way it was carried out, it's tremendously awesome. The impact did go a little haywire in between, but otherwise it was simply perfect.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (8/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3.5/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
A character sketch is missing which is one of the most important parts of a book. But, apart from that, everything regarding characters looked subtle and sweet and perfect.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)
Nothing much to say about the flow because it was simply perfect. Just a very few places saw a break of flow in the sentences, but they were also not very noticeable. So all in all, it was a well knit book.
OVERALL OPINION: (8/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (75/100) = 75%

(3) "Kash Main Hota" by Doraashi

COVER: (5.5/10)
• Creativity- (1.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (1/2)
The cover requires a serious work as it's not at all creative, and the little creativity which has been instilled, makes the graphics unclear. However, it is completely relatable to the storyline. But, you can have a really extraordinary cover with this strong storyline.
TITLE: (8.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (2/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (1.5/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
There's a slight spelling error. It has to be 'Main' instead of 'Mai'. The title is good to go, but something more interesting and unique would have made it a boom. But yes, it's a very beautiful title overall with perfect relatability to the storyline.
BLURB: (6.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2/3)
• Insight into the book- (2/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1/2)
• Power to excite- (1.5/2)
There are massive punctuation errors noticed, though grammar and spellings are fine. It gives a good insight into the book and ofcourse generates excitement, but some emotional lines and something in depth about the story would have made this blurb one of a kind.
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
Prologue is missing
GRAMMAR: (6.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2/3)
• Punctuation- (0.5/2)
There were a lot of punctuation errors in literally each sentence. However, the grammatical portion looked quite well with some noticeable errors here and there.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (10/10)
• How emotional is the plot- (5/5)
• Impact- (3/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
Without any doubts, it's one of the most emotional plots I have ever read and this book will surely find a permanent place in every reader's heart with the kind of impact it leaves. A very unique and beautiful plot with perfect concoction of past and present.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (8/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
There's nothing much to say about the character development as it was perfect. If there was a slight point where introduction could have been better, it was underweighed by the strong storyline.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)
Connectivity of the scenes was drop dead perfect, however there could have been a very slight improvement in the poetry by Nanu.
OVERALL OPINION: (9/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (73.5/100) = 73.5%

(4) "TANHAYEE" by Diku1302

COVER: (4.5/10)
• Creativity- (0.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
I feel so sad to mark such low in cover. It is such a wonderful storyline which can have such an astounding cover, but you lack here a lot. I would highly recommend you to get a new cover because this story deserves a wonderful one.
TITLE: (8/10)
• Uniqueness- (1/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
There's no uniqueness in the title, yet it's very much relatable to the storyline. Though the spellings are correct like this too, but maybe 'Tanhai' would have spelt better.
BLURB: (6.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2.5/3)
• Insight into the book- (2/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1/2)
• Power to excite- (1/2)
The concept is mind-blowing and hence it requires a very strong blurb to excite people more into this story. You need to work a lot on the blurb so that more readers are attracted to it.
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
A prologue is missing.
GRAMMAR: (8.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
• Quality of sentences- (3/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
The grammar was mostly fine and sentences were quite amazing.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (9.5/10)
• How emotional is the plot- (4.5/5)
• Impact- (3/3)
• Execution- (2/2)
A lot of people have written on this track but you took it in the most unique way with a perfect concoction of emotions and lessons. A very well knit plot.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (8/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
Each and every character was introduced and utilised properly, even the characters of Pandit, Vishakha and Vivek.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)
Everything was mostly perfect.
OVERALL OPINION: (9/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (73.5/100) = 73.5%

| O T H E R |
| P A R T I C I P A N T S |

Main phir bhi tumko chahungi by shambhavisontakke

COVER: (6/10)
• Creativity- (2.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (1.5/2)
First of all, the cover doesn't include blends, which counts as a major part of creativity in a cover. Secondly, the story centers more around Naina, so the main image should have been of Naina and not Sameer. Thirdly, as far as clarity of graphics is concerned, the above two images could have been better and better shades would have made the cover better overall.
TITLE: (5.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (1/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (0.5/2)
The title is too common to be marked over 1 in uniqueness. Though it relates quite well with the storyline, but something interesting could have been kept to synchronise with the entire book, including all the aspects. It surely had no spelling errors, but capitalisation was not at all taken into consideration. Along with all this, the title is too long. An ideal title should not be of more than 3 words.
BLURB: (3/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (1/3)
• Insight into the book- (1/3)
• Writing style or flow- (0.5/2)
• Power to excite- (0.5/2)
I couldn't even call it as a blurb, because all it contained was just one line. Just one line in the blurb cannot tell you anything about the book. Even in that one line, there were capitalisation, grammatical and punctuation errors. I would suggest you to write a full proper blurb for your book.
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
No prologue written. A prologue of approximately 1000 words is highly suggested because that's what would intrigue your readers towards the book, and would lure them to stay till the end.
GRAMMAR: (6/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (3.5/5)
• Quality of sentences- (1/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
The grammar is not so good, with quality of sentences which definitely need great improvement. However, the punctuation was quite nice, with just a few errors here and there.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (5.5/10)
• How emotional is the plot- (3/5)
• Impact- (1.5/3)
• Execution- (1/2)
This was a very nice concept which could have brought forward in a much better way. Emotional plots require patience and space of construction which was really missing in this book. Proper explanation of scenes was required at a lot of places. There were a lot of instances which looked vague. The change of situations was also very fast paced, so you need to work a lot on the storyline because it has a very good emotional potential which wasn't brought out properly.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
There was just a small need of better introduction of characters because when a new reader is reading a book, considering it as a general fiction, proper introduction of characters is needed. But, the utilisation of each and every character was done in an amazing way.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (6/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (2.5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (3.5/5)
The connectivity of scenes honestly looked like what it should have been in a prologue. It was changing too fast and should have slowed down in a lot of places. The flow of sentences was good, but still demands improvement.
OVERALL OPINION: (5.5/10)
To be very honest, this story has literally got the potential to make people cry, but it was not executed properly. The topic is very nice, hence it requires great work to be done which will actually make it one of the most emotional plots handled in Samaina category.
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (54.5/100) = 54.5%

Kachi Umar Ke Rishte by riyuuu_33

COVER: (7/10)
• Creativity- (4/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (1/2)
The creativity in the cover was quite good, but the amount of Samaina pictures could have been reduced as they looked congested and unnecessary.
TITLE: (7/10)
• Uniqueness- (1/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (1.5/2)
The title isn't very unique with a small capitalisation error. But, the title looked quite relatable with the storyline.
BLURB: (4.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (1/3)
• Insight into the book- (2/3)
• Writing style or flow- (0.5/2)
• Power to excite- (1/2)
There were a lot of grammatical errors in the blurb with some punctuation errors as well. Though it gives a good amount of insight into the book, but it should have been more clear and more smooth. A lot of changes are required in the blurb.
PROLOGUE: (4/10)
• Suspense created- (2.5/5)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (1/3)
• Writing style or flow- (0.5/2)
I felt the prologue somewhat solved the confusions of the blurb instead of creating suspense. Along with that, improper grammar and lack of flow of sentences made it look more or less just a dialogue delivery, that's it.
GRAMMAR: (4/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (2/5)
• Quality of sentences- (1/3)
• Punctuation- (1/2)
A lot of improvement is required in terms of all the three sectors of grammar. Quality and flow of sentences need a very hard push. Also, there are so many typos which need to be rectified. Always proofread your content before publishing.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (2.5/10)
• How emotional is the plot- (1/5)
• Impact- (1/3)
• Execution- (0.5/2)
If Naina is just 16, Sameer is also below 21 and you are showing a happy marriage, you are promoting marriages before legal age. I understand that such things happen in villages, but they are wrong and should strictly not be promoted. And after this where you are showing that Naina had given birth even before marriage, it all looked actually messed up and unrealistic. I am extremely sorry to say, but in the whole story, I felt less of emotions and more of unnecessary and inappropriate drama.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (5/10)
• Character sketch- (0.5/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (1.5/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (3/4)
The character sketch of the supporting characters should be placed just after the main ones. Both of them could have been made more interesting by adding some quotes, with a better introduction. Also, if Naina is in 10th and 16 years old, how come Swati and Preeti can be 13 years old in 9th standard? Introducing the characters as Girl 1, Girl 2, Lady 1, Lady 2 etc.. gets confusing. You should directly start with the name and introduce them in your content. Using terms like Girl 1, Girl 2 breaks the flow of the book. Though, all the characters were well utilised.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (4.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (3/5)
• Flow of sentences- (1.5/5)
The mixture of Hindi and English explanation makes it so confusing to understand. The flow gets interrupted again and again because of this change. If you wish to write in both English and Hindi, the explanation should be in English and the dialogues in Hindi. You mixed the languages in explanation too. I couldn't really find a good connection between the dialogues. When you are writing the story in a dialogue format, you should especially be careful about the flow which was not maintained here properly.
OVERALL OPINION: (4/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (52.5/100) = 52.5%

Ek kaanch ki gudiya by Doraashi

COVER: (6/10)
• Creativity- (2.5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (1.5/2)
It was good to see the effect of the broken glass, but the cover needs quite a massive work because it isn't very creative. Though it's very much relatable, but the graphics aren't very clear and you can add a lot more in the cover.
TITLE: (8.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (3/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (0.5/2)
As the marks say, everything else was perfect apart from the capitalisation. It should have been "Ek Kaanch ki Gudiya".
BLURB: (4/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2/3)
• Insight into the book- (1/3)
• Writing style or flow- (0.5/2)
• Power to excite- (0.5/2)
You need a completely new blurb because neither did this blurb add any proper insight into the book, not did it have any impactful lines.
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
A prologue is missing.
GRAMMAR: (6.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (3.5/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2.5/3)
• Punctuation- (0.5/2)
There were a plethora of punctuation mistakes which couldn't be ignored at all. Grammatical portion was just fine, because there were quite a few noticeable grammatical errors while the quality of sentences also need a charge.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (7.5/10)
• How emotional is the plot- (4/5)
• Impact- (2/3)
• Execution- (1.5/2)
It was a very good plot, something very unique but it requires work on it. It couldn't be made that emotional. I guess a lot more emotional dialogues and scenes are required to make its impact worth it.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (8/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
A character sketch is missing which is very important to add. Rest everything regarding the characters and their development is perfect.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (8.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4.5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4/5)
The flow of the scenes was near to perfect, however the flow of sentences do require improvement.
OVERALL OPINION: (7.5/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (66.5/100) = 66.5%

Blooming Hearts by Euphoric_18

COVER: (9/10)
• Creativity- (5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
Everything else is perfect in the cover apart from the fact that there should have been something more in the cover apart from the wedding scenes because this book is much more than just the wedding.
TITLE: (8/10)
• Uniqueness- (0.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (3/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
All the marks went in the uniqueness because this is one of the most common titles which we see in various books here and there.
BLURB: (5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2.5/3)
• Insight into the book- (1/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1/2)
• Power to excite- (0.5/2)
Well, as we read the blurb, it doesn't excite much because it looks to be a very very common plot. Though the book is very beautiful, but it's way to cliché and the blurb doesn't add any value to it. You need some lines and dialogues from the book in the blurb to make it more interesting.
PROLOGUE: (5.5/10)
• Suspense created- (2/5)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2.5/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1/2)
The prologue was fine with good amount of information, but again, the prologue made the book look extremely common, because there are so many books with the same plot as described in the prologue, no matter how different turns it took later in the story.
GRAMMAR: (7.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2/3)
• Punctuation- (1.5/2)
The grammatical portion was good with some errors here and there and the quality of sentences increased as the number of chapters moved forward.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (5.5/10)
• How emotional is the plot- (2/5)
• Impact- (2/3)
• Execution- (1.5/2)
The plot exactly wasn't emotional, it was just some scenes and sequences in between which were emotional. However, the overall impact and execution were quite fine.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (8/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
The character sketch was missing which needs to be added, rest everything about the character development was perfect.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (7.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4/5)
• Flow of sentences- (3.5/5)
The connectivity of the scenes was near to perfect, but the flow of sentences did waver in between, though they improved with time.
OVERALL OPINION: (7/10)
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (73/100) = 73%

Armaan from Ankahe Dastaan by issabella_8 and @anushkaraj020

COVER: (9/10)
• Creativity- (5/5)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (1/2)
The banner is simply perfect. Just the title could have been a little more clear on it and too many pictures reduced the clarity of graphics.
TITLE: (7/10)
• Uniqueness- (0.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
You lost marks majorly in the uniqueness of the title as it was way too common.
BLURB: (--/10)
Since it is a standalone chapter from a series, a blurb was not required.
PROLOGUE: (--/10)
Since it is a standalone chapter from a series, a prologue was not required.
GRAMMAR: (7.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
• Quality of sentences- (2.5/3)
• Punctuation- (1/2)
Quite noticeable punctuation and spelling errors noticed with slight grammatical errors as well. Rest everything was fine.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (6.5/10)
• How emotional is the plot- (3/5)
• Impact- (2/3)
• Execution- (1.5/2)
No doubt it was one of the most unique plots to write on, but it was more of a beautiful reminiscing plot than an emotion one. Maybe someone else would see it from different eyes, but that's what I felt.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7/10)
• Character sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3.5/4)
• Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (3.5/4)
Not much to comment upon the character development, but it would have been better if you would have included all the three sons-in-law as well.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (8.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (3.5/5)
Fully contented with the connectivity and flow of scenes, however the flow of sentences could have been better.
OVERALL OPINION: (6.5/10)
FOLLOW: (5/10)
Since one of the authors have left Wattpad, I could give only half marks for the remaining author.
TOTAL: (57/100) = 71.25%

❢◥ ▬▬▬▬▬▬ ◆ ▬▬▬▬▬▬ ◤❢

We, at FamiliaDeYUDKBH congratulate all the participants and the winners of Most Emotional Plot and wish them a brighter future, both on Wattpad and in their lives.

The prizes would be distributed soon. Please check the chapter "Punctuality" to get the timeline of the awards.

Incase of any doubts from the admins, please pm, and incase of any doubts from the judge (pahul_gpk), please comment down and tag her.

Thankyou YUDKBHians.
We await your participation in the next edition as well.❤️