๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐
Following are the judgements for all the nominated books under the genre "Best Comedy Plot". Before we proceed further, we would like to thank MathsMaster123 for giving unbiased judgements on time. The participants are requested not to unfollow either the community or the judge after the end of the awards as it was a permanent follow which was asked.
We hope that you are satisfied with the reviews and the judgements. Although we have made sure that no malpractice occurs, still if you feel any kind of biasness taking place, you are requested to politely ping us your doubt in the pm.
If you have any questions to be asked from the judge, i.e. MathsMaster123, you can politely comment down your doubts and tag her. She'll reply to your queries asap. Also, all the participants are requested to leave atleast one comment to acknowledge the review.
Before we begin with the reviews, there's this one thing which we all should always keep in mind, that "Participation is the principle of learning." and that, "Winning is something, but participation is everything." We want to encourage all of you to learn and improve with these reviews and come back stronger.
Many many congratulations to all the participants who came forward to showcase their talents. ๐
Here you go with the reviews.
| W I N N E R |
As the number of slots were just 5, we had already informed you that there would be just one winner. And the winner for the Best Comedy Plot is "Drunked Father in law" by Doraashi. Heartiest Congratulations to you for being a winner of the second edition of Suman- Ek Anokha Puruskaar.๐ฅณ
Here is the judgement of your book:
COVER: (3.5/10)
{since it was a chapter from a series, we have used the banner as the cover}
โข Creativity- (0/5)
โข Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
โข Clarity of graphics- (0.5/2)
I should suggest a special banner for the story as it is an OS. The banner should have a glimpse of the story with good amount of creativity in it.
TITLE: (4/10)
โข Uniqueness- (1.5/3)
โข Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
โข Grammar or spellings- (1/2)
โข Capitalisation- (0.5/2)
The title of the story could have been more interesting with uniqueness and humour in it. There is perfect relatability with the storyline but lacks capitalisation and correct grammar.
BLURB: (-/10)
{since it was a chapter from a series, a separate blurb was not present and required}
PROLOGUE: (-/10)
{since it was a chapter from a series, a prologue was not present and required}
GRAMMAR: (7.5/10)
โข Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
โข Quality of sentences- (2/3)
โข Punctuation- (1.5/2)
The quality of sentences can be better and there are some grammatical mistakes in the story which cannot be unseen. Punctuation also needs improvement.
PLOT AND CONCEPT: (10/10)
โข How hilarious is the plot- (5/5)
โข Impact- (3/3)
โข Execution- (2/2)
It was really a very funny story. The plot and concept is very good.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (4.5/10)
โข Character sketch- (0/2)
โข Introduction of characters between the storyline- (2/4)
โข Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (2.5/4)
The absence of the character sketch deduct your marks here. The story is too short to explain the character, so including it in the beginning would help the readers a lot.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (6.5/10)
โข Connectivity of scenes- (3/5)
โข Flow of sentences- (3.5/5)
Flow of the story was good but the story length is very short. The main scene should have been described more. It was all done in a very rushed way. Can be done better.
OVERALL OPINION: (7/10)
I appreciate you for the main part, the humour in it is the best. Besides, it's very nice work. It is the most humorous story I have read.
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (53/80) = 66.25%
| O T H E R |
| P A R T I C I P A N T S |
Love Never Ends by Princesszareen21
COVER: (4.5/10)
โข Creativity- (1.5/5)
โข Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
โข Clarity of graphics- (1/2)
I suggest you make a more relatable and attractive cover for the story. Only placing the pictures of four pairs in the story doesn't make the readers excited for reading it.
TITLE: (7.5/10)
โข Uniqueness- (1/3)
โข Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
โข Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
โข Capitalisation- (2/2)
The title was expected to be unique, and by using some fonts it can be made attractive.
BLURB: (5/10)
โข Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (1.5/3)
โข Insight into the book- (2/3)
โข Writing style or flow- (0.5/2)
โข Power to excite- (1/2)
The BLURB lacks correct grammar and spellings with a little punctuation. The flow is undone in it. Use some dialogues to make it exciting.
PROLOGUE: (5.5/10)
โข Suspense created- (3/5)
โข Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (1.5/3)
โข Writing style or flow- (1/2)
The flow should have been better if you leave space between the sentences and paragraphs. Make the prologue even more attractive by capitalisation and punctuation with correct spellings in it.
GRAMMAR: (7/10)
โข Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
โข Quality of sentences- (1.5/3)
โข Punctuation- (1.5/2)
Improvement in the quality of sentences is required. Punctuation and grammar also demand perfection.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (6.5/10)
โข How hilarious is the plot- (2.5/5)
โข Impact- (2/3)
โข Execution- (2/2)
Humour can be seen in clearly but can be done better. I like the reaction of characters described in a humorous way. Appreciation for the idea and narration.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (9/10)
Character sketch- (1/2)
Introduction of characters between the storyline- (4/4)
Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (4/4)
The Characters are described nicely between the story. The character sketch should have been done more formally.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (5/10)
โข Connectivity of scenes- (2/5)
โข Flow of sentences- (3/5)
You should leave the space between the dialogues because sometimes it looks like two dialogues mix with each other. Therefore the sentences sometimes feel incomplete. The flow is lacking in the story.
OVERALL OPINION: (5/10)
Overall the story is good with a good humour in it as a Comedy Plot. Improve the quality and Grammar of the story. Flow of the story should also be improved. Give a touch to the story by good connectivity of scenes and sentences.
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (65/100) = 65%
Pandit aur uski Aashiqui by ishqdinoorhai3
COVER: (3.5/10)
โข Creativity- (0.5/5)
โข Relatability with storyline- (2/3)
โข Clarity of graphics- (1/2)
The cover is so simple. Make it beautiful by adding more pictures with the story title. It should be made more creative which excite the readers to read the story.
TITLE: (7.5/10)
โข Uniqueness- (1/3)
โข Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
โข Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
โข Capitalisation- (1.5/2)
The Title is expected to be made more unique. It also lacks capitalisation. You can use the fonts for making it attractive.
BLURB: (3.5/10)
โข Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2.5/3)
โข Insight into the book- (0.5/3)
โข Writing style or flow- (0.5/2)
โข Power to excite- (0/2)
The BLURB is too short to introduce the story. One line blurb cannot give full access to the story and does not excite the people. Make it of atleast one paragraph which gives full Insight of the story.
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
โข Suspense created- (0/5)
โข Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (0/3)
โข Writing style or flow- (0/2)
No prologue written. Do write a good prologue for your book, even if it is an OS.
GRAMMAR: (9/10)
โข Grammatical Portion- (4/5)
โข Quality of sentences- (3/3)
โข Punctuation- (2/2)
There are small errors in the case of grammar. The quality of sentences and punctuation are good as expected.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (8.5/10)
โข How hilarious is the plot- (3.5/5)
โข Impact- (3/3)
โข Execution- (2/2)
It's idea and uniqueness make it different from all stories. The scenes are explained very efficiently. However, just something lacks in humour portion.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (6/10)
โข Character sketch- (0/2)
โข Introduction of characters between the storyline- (2.5/4)
โข Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (3.5/4)
Every character is considered in it with their nature despite of being an OS but the character sketch is not present which deducted your marks here.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (9/10)
โข Connectivity of scenes- (4.5/5)
โข Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)
The flow could be done better. The difference between the present and flashbacks gets confusing at some places.
OVERALL OPINION: (8/10)
Overall the story is unique and the concept of Pandit is good. At last the revelation should have been explained more briefly. The cover lacks a story title and no creativity is seen in it.
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (65/100) = 65%
After The Last Break Up by priyasamaina
COVER: (7/10)
โข Creativity- (3/5)
โข Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
โข Clarity of graphics- (1.5/2)
The cover is good but the creativity lacks in it. It should have been done better.
TITLE: (6.5/10)
โข Uniqueness- (0.5/3)
โข Relatability with storyline- (2.5/3)
โข Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
โข Capitalisation- (1.5/2)
The title should have be more unique. The capitalisation is also not clear. Using a different font in title also made it look beautiful.
BLURB: (5.5/10)
โข Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2/3)
โข Insight into the book- (1.5/3)
โข Writing style or flow- (1/2)
โข Power to excite- (1/2)
The grammar and punctuation should be improved in it. The BLURB does not give full insight into the book. There should be some scene or dialouge which helps in exciting the people.
PROLOGUE: (0/10)
โข Suspense created- (0/5)
โข Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (0/3)
โข Writing style or flow- (0/2)
No prologue written. Do write a good prologue for your book, even if it is an OS.
GRAMMAR: (4/10)
โข Grammatical Portion- (2/5)
โข Quality of sentences- (1/3)
โข Punctuation- (1/2)
There are many errors in grammar in your story. The quality of sentences is expected to improve. The right punctuation has been used in the right place which helps in direct speech. Capitalisation in dialogues is also not present.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (6/10)
โข How hilarious is the plot- (2.5/5)
โข Impact- (1.5/3)
โข Execution- (2/2)
Your story is really very unique, good and interesting. It's a humorous story but the amount of humour is not as expected. You should have explained the scene after their last break up efficiently and nicely where the humour should not have missed.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (5/10)
โข Character sketch- (0/2)
โข Introduction of characters between the storyline- (1.5/4)
โข Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (3.5/4)
You should work on the characters sketch. There is no character sketch and introduction between the storyline is also missing. It does not introduce the characters fully. While utilisation of characters is almost perfect.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (8/10)
โข Connectivity of scenes- (4/5)
โข Flow of sentences- (4/5)
The flow of the story is good. The story connects the sentences nicely but can be done better. A lot to do in the case of dialogues.
OVERALL OPINION: (6/10)
Overall the story is good and the message given by it is also nice. All you need is a good prologue and epilogue. The prologue and especially epilogue must have completed the story. Appreciation for your uniqueness and ideas.
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (58/100) = 58%
Kachru is back by Doraashi
COVER: (3.5/10)
{since it was a chapter from a series, we have used the banner as the cover}
โข Creativity- (3/5)
โข Relatability with storyline- (0/3)
โข Clarity of graphics- (0.5/2)
The banner should be made more creative and relatable as the cover of OS.
TITLE: (7.5/10)
โข Uniqueness- (1/3)
โข Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
โข Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
โข Capitalisation- (1.5/2)
The title is not really a unique one. Also, the capitalisation can be improved.
BLURB: (-/10)
{since it was a chapter from a series, a separate blurb was not present and required}
PROLOGUE: (-/10)
{since it was a chapter from a series, a prologue was not present and required}
GRAMMAR: (4/10)
โข Grammatical Portion- (3.5/5)
โข Quality of sentences- (0.5/3)
โข Punctuation- (0/2)
There is a need to improve grammar and punctuation. No punctuation is used properly. The quality of sentences is also not good. There is no space between the paragraphs. The story is good. But the punctuation and capitalisation with the dialogue, have been missed in the story.
PLOT & CONCEPT: (6/10)
โข How hilarious is the plot- (3/5)
โข Impact- (1.5/3)
โข Execution- (1.5/2)
The plot and concept is good but the story must be written clearly. It is not a story with clear dialogue and narration, which does not allow readers to read. Humour is in good quantity but can be better. Besides its unique story, with humour in it.
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (4/10)
โข Character sketch- (0/2)
โข Introduction of characters between the storyline- (2/4)
โข Utilisation or screen space of the characters- (2/4)
The character sketch is not present. The introduction and utilisation of characters are not done properly which needs a touch.
FLOW OF THE STORY: (2/10)
โข Connectivity of scenes- (2/5)
โข Flow of sentences- (0/5)
There is no flow of the sentences. The sentences and dialogues are not seen clearly. The sentences are mixed up with each other.
OVERALL OPINION: (4/10)
Overall the story is not clearly written. The Writing skills like punctuation, spacing and capitalisation with grammar are very much needed in the story. The story is not presented in a good way.
FOLLOW: (10/10)
TOTAL: (41/80) = 51.25%
โขโฅ โฌโฌโฌโฌโฌโฌ โ โฌโฌโฌโฌโฌโฌ โคโข
We, at FamiliaDeYUDKBH congratulate all the participants and the winner of Best Comedy Plot and wish them a brighter future, both on Wattpad and in their lives.
The prizes would be distributed soon. Please check the chapter "Punctuality" to get the timeline of the awards.
Incase of any doubts from the admins, please pm, and incase of any doubts from the judge (MathsMaster123), please comment down and tag her.
Thankyou YUDKBHians.
We await your participation in the next edition as well.โค๏ธ
Bแบกn ฤang ฤแปc truyแปn trรชn: Truyen247.Pro