its phantoms_bride again;;
wooo
me and ThePinkBurrito are screaming over skype about this as i type this

so passion and pain equals making sevreal thousands girls wet and ruining the orginal piece?

keep in mind Erik was not meant to be sexual in the novel. As of the moment i have started to read it and I can assure you 2004 characture of Erik is butchered up to have more of a romantic feel rather than the fatherly-daughterly bond that was portrayed in some adaptations and in the novel

Fuck man, in one adapation she actually murdered Erik in defense for her and Raoul.
Erik is a sociopath and he isn't supposed to be glorified in that sexual manner
In the novel's representation he looks like this;

He is the devil's child and the walking corpses in the book.

Sweetie idk what corpses you have seen but they tend not to,,,have,,,,muscular builds

But it wasn't supposed to be a fucking romance
You don't give suspense in that manner--and anyone who has ever even been outside and have seen forms of media know why Erik wears the fucking mask. He has a deformity

He has a mild sunburn on the left side of his face, yeah totally, fucking crippling.

Dude I would still bang this man okay

give it a month or two it'll be good as new

IM GONNA BAWL MY EYES OUT THE SUNBURN WAS A COMPARISON U CUCK
ITS BECAUSE IT WAS SO MILD AND INSIGNIFICANT
IN THE ORGINAL LINES OF ONE OF THE SONGS  TALKS ABOUT HOW HIS FACE ISN'T A F A C E

is this not a face fggt

ALSO MORON
OF COURSE THE BROADWAY ISNT AT DETAILED AS tHE MOVIES
IT HAS TO POP UP FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK ROWS DICKHEAD
IT ISNT LIKE A MOVIE WHERE A CAMERA IS RIGHT THERE
ITS LIKE 30-50 FEET AWAY FROM UR EYES
CO M M O N S E N S E

burrito never called you a slut moving along

youre comparing a play about a man who lives in the catacombs who became a social outcast due to his extreme disformates to a sex novel for middle aged women
k