Chào các bạn! Vì nhiều lý do từ nay Truyen2U chính thức đổi tên là Truyen247.Pro. Mong các bạn tiếp tục ủng hộ truy cập tên miền mới này nhé! Mãi yêu... ♥

notes

*Types of presupposition

Existential:      the X/one’s X                          >>X exists

Factive:           I regret leaving                        >> I left

Non – factive: He pretended to be happy      >> He wasn’t happy

Lexical:           He managed to escape                        >> He tried to escape

Structural:       When did she leave?               >> She left

Counterfactual: If I weren’t ill                       >> I’m ill

* maxisms:

- quality: not say anything false or lack adequate evidence.

- quantity: informative as required

- relation: stay on topic

- manner: avoid ambiguity, obscurity of expression, be brief and orderly.

*properties of Conversational implicatures:

- Calculability: every conversational implicature can be calculated from the meaning of what is said plus identifiable of the context.

- Reinforcibility: speaker can supply material that entails what would be only conversationally implicated

- Suspension: speaker can suspend the implicatures by using the expression: “at least”

- Cancellability: speaker can add futher infor, often following the expression “in fact” to indicate the inference not be drawn.

- Deniability: speakers can always deny the intended meanings because implicatures are part of what’s communicated and not said.

*speech act type:

Declarations: S causes X -> words change the world (I declare you to be husband and wife)

Representatives: S believes X -> makes words fit the outside world (It’s a hot day)

Expressives: S feels X -> makes words fit the inside world of speaker (I’m sorry)

Directives: S wants X -> listener makes the world fit the word (Give me a cup of coffee)

Commissives: S intends X -> Speaker makes the world fit the word (We’ll not do that)

*Felicity conditions:

General condition: S and H understand the language

Content con: S predicates a future act of A of S

Preparatory con: S believes that doing act A is in H’s best interest and that S can do A

Sincertity con: S intends to do act A

Essential con: S undertake an obiligation to do act A

*Do not perform FTA

- say nothing or opting out choice (OOC)

- 2 types: + OOC genuine: let the matter remain closed

            + OOC strategic: expects other to infer Self’s wish to achieve the perlocutionary effect.

*Bald – on-record (the least polite)

- not attempt to minimize the threat to the hearer’s face

- shock or embarrass the addressee

- situations: S has close relation w H

* Positive politeness Strategies

- notice, attend to H > You look sad. Can I do anything?

- use in – group identity markers > come here, honey.

- seek agreement and avoid disagreement > no, he’s not a generous man, is he?

- propose or assert common ground > go out w me, babe?

- joke

- offer, promise

- be optimistic: I’m sure you won’t mind if I use your cellphone.

- include both S and H in the activity : Let’s….

- Give or ask 4 reasons: Why not…?

- Give sympathy to H: I’m really sorry to hear….

* Negative politeness strategies:

- be conventionally indirect: Would/ could….

- question, hedge: Perhaps./…

- pessimistic: you won’t go to the party, will you?

- minimize the imposition: “I just want….”

- give deference (respect)

- apologize: I’m sorry, it’s a lot to ask, but you….

-impersonalize S and H:

- state the FTAs as a general rule: visitors sign the ledger.

- norminalize

- go on record as incurring debt or as not indebting H : I’d be eternally grateful if you could come.

Bạn đang đọc truyện trên: Truyen247.Pro

Tags: