chapter 9 - idea
CHAPTER 9
Team Mapping
Method
181
Some of the most exhilarating and nerve-racking work I
do is to facilitate teams through the process of creating,
sharing, consolidating, and prioritizing their ideas around a
real issue. It is exhilarating because the people involved in the
process get excited. Invariably the outcome is much better
than the traditional brainstorming session we have all experienced.
It's also nerve-racking because there's little I can do
to prepare for these sessions, it's very difficult to judge the
timing, and I have no control over the outcome. The only
thing I can do is review the process and objective prior to the
session, clearly explain the process to the group, make sure
everyone understands the topic or issue at hand, and manage
the personalities and emotions of the participants. In addition,
I try to make it fun.
Much of my work using this method is in the area of
strategic planning, although you can use this technique any
time a team of people are contributing ideas for a common
purpose. As I walk you through the process, imagine that you
are participating in this session with your team and I am the
facilitator. Here is what this chapter will cover:
182
• Defining the Topic
• Individual Idea Map
• Suggestions
• First Consolidation
• Second Consolidation
• Prioritization
• Taking Action
• Review and Update
• Benefits
• Your Assignment
Defining the Topic
Having a clear and shared understanding of the topic is absolutely
critical to the success of this process. I have participated
in many meetings and discussions where the purpose,
the issue, or the topic was never clearly defined. The funny
thing is that I don't know if the participants ever realized the
lack of definition. But the frustration was certainly evident.
When this is the case there is confusion, people are attempting
to solve the wrong problem, discussions get off track, and
time is wasted. The other problem I've seen is when groups
try to tackle multiple topics at the same time. I understand
that sometimes the complexity of the issue requires doing
this, but whenever possible take one topic at a time. The
more you can simplify the topic (even if the subject itself is
complex) the better. I've also seen attempts to simplify the
topic turn into having too vague a topic. This brings us to
Lesson 11, which is:
Lesson Eleven-
Clearly identify a single, simple,
and specific topic for the
Team Mapping Method.
One last comment about the topic: How many times do you
see teams head off on some project that doesn't meet the objectives
or vision of the organization? Take the time upfront
to share with the team the importance of the issue and how it
ties to the vision or purpose of the organization or project. It
Team Mapping Method
183
will provide an even greater context for and commitment to
the process that is to be followed.
Individual Idea Map
Once the topic is defined, each person independently creates
an idea map of everything they can possibly think of relating
to the topic. In the case of an annual strategic planning session,
I ask participants to capture thoughts around some of
the following categories:
• Current organizational struggles
• Personnel-related issues (i.e., hiring, retention)
• New products and services
• Training
• Customers (current and future)
• Next year's objectives
• Marketing and advertising
• Suppliers
• Finances/budget
• Opportunities
• Cost savings and revenue generation
• Technology
• Processes and work flow
• Recognition
• Production
• Competition
IDEA MAPPING
184
I use this as a way to get individuals thinking, and to encourage
their own creative thoughts as well. Even the creation of
a central image can help to further clarify the topic when it
comes time for the first consolidation. All ideas, words, and
concepts are to stay in the map. No editing of ideas should
occur at this point.
Lesson Twelve-
Always start the team mapping
process by asking each participant
to create an individual map
around the defined topic.
The individual maps are critical to the process. In a typical
session when one person throws out an idea, it can draw the
whole group into a single train of thought. This is similar to
the flow of thoughts introduced in Chapter 2. What needs
to occur at this stage is a bloom of ideas (BrainBloom_) that
will eventually be used to generate multitudes of possibilities.
When this stage is overlooked, participants have a tendency
to let the boss or the most influential person guide
most of the process. The individual map provides opportunities
for some of the more quiet thinkers to add their brilliance
into the session.
This part of the process could take some time depending
on the size and complexity of the issue the group is tackling.
If you foresee this being a lengthy first step, one suggestion
might be to have this portion of the task completed
as mandatory prework to the session. (If one person doesn't
Team Mapping Method
185
do this, it will affect the rest of the process.) The benefit here
is that each person can dedicate whatever time they need. Because
of the varying roles of the participants, some will need
to spend much longer creating their maps than others. You
avoid people waiting around for others to finish. When team
members come to the session, have each person take 5-10
minutes to review their maps and make any additions (no
deletions) that come to mind.
Whether participants create a quick individual map
during the session or they come to the session with their
maps, we are now ready for the first consolidation. Before
addressing the next step, let me share some suggestions.
Suggestions
Encourage creative thinking. You do not want to put time
and energy into a process that achieves average results.
Sometimes people get nervous sharing ideas that are far
from the norm. This isn't the case when a crisis requires an
ingenious solution, so do not let this be the case during the
session either. Tell the team to avoid imposing limitations on
themselves. Don't let the budget, the boss, the client, or the
market deter you from considering any idea. If the idea is
that important, maybe the team can discover an inventive solution.
An environment of fun can spice things up a bit too.
Provide toys, music, colored markers, and healthy snacks.
Take breaks every hour or when it seems appropriate based
on the flow of ideas and the energy level of the group.
Kill the idea-killer. There is no one more destructive
to one of these sessions than the person who shoots down
ideas. It only takes one shot and the victim will clam up for
IDEA MAPPING
186
the rest of the day. Most idea-killers don't know who they are
so it is your responsibility to tell them. Buy some fun toys
that make noise and give one to each participant. Then set
some ground rules. Tell team members that any time they
feel like their idea is being killed, they are to use their noisemaker
to make the perpetrator aware of the violation. It will
add some humor to the process and make the killer aware of
his or her crime.
First Consolidation
The next step is going to be a consolidation of ideas. I suggest
3-4 members per group. Your group may be much
larger than this, but try to break it down into smaller groups.
We will handle the consolidation of the overall groups' ideas
later. You can select the groups based on common areas of
work or interest, or you may prefer cross-functional groups.
Both have unique benefits, so choose for yourself based on
the topic and purpose for this activity.
Start by having each team member share his or her individual
maps with his or her group. If during this time of
sharing it sparks additional thoughts, add them to your map.
This is a time to share-not critique. Use those noisemakers
if necessary.
The next step gets a little tricky the first time you try
this. The result will be one large idea map that contains all of
the information from every member's map. Yes, I do mean
all. Using large flip-chart paper or the Mindjet software,
your task will be to determine a main thought that some of
you have in common. This could be your first main branch
for the group map. You may even want to create an over-
Team Mapping Method
187
riding word to describe the varying words the group members
used for this common thought. It is important at this
stage not to assume that two identical words mean the same
thing to two people. You need to keep the original context
and meaning clear. What I mean by "re-engineering" could
be completely different than your meaning or context. Take
the time to clarify.
Once the group has identified the first main branch (or
branches), look for all the ideas in your map that connect to
this thought. Add those ideas to the map. You work your way
through this process until all ideas from the maps are in one
large map. If new ideas result from the conversations, add
them into the map as well. Add images wherever you can.
When you're done, take a break.
If there are a large number of individuals participating
in this session (5 groups of 4 members each, for example), it
is now time for each team to share their map with all who are
present. It is likely that you will hear some similar themes between
team maps as well as original possibilities. Again, if
these presentations spark new ideas, add them to your group
map. You will be fascinated by the varying ways teams captured
their data. Team members see their ideas captured and
valued. People who normally might not share have actively
participated in the process.
Second Consolidation
If the original group was only 3-4 individuals, skip to prioritization.
If there were multiple groups of 3-4 people, the
question needs to be asked, "Is there value in consolidating
all of this information?" In most cases, the answer will be yes.
IDEA MAPPING
188
Again, either you will need large paper or you will need to
use the Mindjet software while projecting the mega-team
map on the screen. Either choose the map that seems to best
represent the thoughts of the group and add information
from the other group maps to it, or repeat the process used
in the first consolidation to build the mega-team map. All
ideas are included at this stage as well. This can end up being
a very large idea map; however, it is interesting that, after a
while, there seems to be a natural consolidation of ideas.
People may say, "well this and that are covered here," so those
ideas can be removed, and the map starts to tighten up.
Prioritization
Now your group, regardless of size, should be working from
a single team map. In the strategic planning sessions I run,
there is now a plethora of possible actions that could be
taken. It is unrealistic to think that all of these tasks could be
accomplished in the next year, so we need to prioritize them.
I usually have people prioritize in two ways. The first
way is by defining those tasks that are most critical to the success
of the overall organization. The objective of the second
prioritization is to identify those tasks that will provide a
quick success to the group. These actions are typically easy
to implement, low cost, and not requiring of months of approvals.
Let's start with the critical success actions.
While everyone can view the mega-map, have each person
individually define his or her top five priorities. You may
use his or her top three or his or her top eight ideas-you decide
based on the volume of data you have to work with. The
lower numbers tend to work better because you're ultimately
Team Mapping Method
189
looking for the critical tasks to emerge rather than prioritizing
every item on the map. Once everyone is ready, the facilitator
will start by having the first person share his or her
rankings. Using a single color (if using a hand-drawn map),
the facilitator should place a "1" by the branch this person
states as his or her number one priority, "2" by the branch
this person states as his or her number two priority, and so
on. Go around the room until all have provided their rankings.
Do another individual prioritization to identify the top
three to five quick successes. If using a hand-drawn map, the
facilitator will choose a different color to collect the rankings
this time. If using the software, simply add a branch called
Quick Success, followed by a branch with all the rankings.
There are many other ways within the software that you can
distinguish the critical actions from quick successes. Choose
one that seems easiest for you. If it has been an hour or so
since the last break, take another one now. This process can
be exciting, but mentally draining.
Taking Action
Now you have a visual of the priorities. Notice if any quick
successes and critical actions overlap. Observe where most
participants agree on the priorities, and identify the top actions
in each category. Notice that no ideas were eliminated.
They just didn't make it into the top lists-yet. This is a major
benefit, as people do not experience the rejection of the
idea. These possibilities are still on the map and can be revisited
at some point in the future. I'll discuss review periods
shortly.
IDEA MAPPING
190
Start with one of the top actions. Have each person create
an individual map on the implementation of this idea.
The maps could include any of the following thoughts and
more:
• Deadlines
• Project team members
• Stakeholders
• Training
• Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats
• Research
• Costs/pricing/budget/revenue
• Customer involvement
• Project scope
• Communication plan
• Impacts
• Project purpose and goals
Once the individual maps are complete, merge these maps by
following the steps in the first consolidation. The implementation
plan for critical actions and quick successes can be
created with the larger group (which may require a second
consolidation) or you may decide to leave the development
of this plan to a group of individuals that will be affected by
or eventually implement the plan.
Team Mapping Method
191
Review and Update
Before leaving the prioritization session, set a date and time
for review of the progress and status of the actions. Keep the
team maps and use them in the review process. Update these
maps with any progress. Eventually you will finish these tasks
and need to set new priorities. Maybe some of the items that
didn't get addressed initially will become more of a priority
now. On the other hand, if business has changed and much
time has passed, you may have to start from scratch with a
fresh look at the topic at hand.
Benefits
The benefits of this process are many. Although it is a time
commitment to work through these consolidations, there
will be shared understanding, teamwork, a boost in morale,
and ultimately timesavings. The clarity alone will bring
common vision to the task. These team maps can act as communication
tools when sharing with other departments or
stakeholders. Post them on the wall to show the status of the
project.
Finally, the idea maps reduce what I call verbal redundancy.
Have you ever attended a meeting where the participants
repeatedly share their comments on a topic that has already
been addressed? I think some people just like to hear
themselves talk. With the map in front of the group, all you
need to do is point to that particular area of discussion and
ask if anyone has any additional thoughts. Otherwise, you
can gently move on to another topic.
IDEA MAPPING
192
Your Assignment
Find an opportunity for making a decision that will involve
at least one other person. It may not be as involved or elaborate
as the process described in this chapter. Experimenting
on a smaller scale using a topic that is not emotionally
charged can give you some exposure to the team mapping
process. Start small and work your way up to a larger, more
complex subject.
Now that you are becoming an expert at the team mapping
method, the next chapter is going to show you examples
of advanced idea maps that break all the rules! See Figure 9.1
for an idea-map summary of this chapter.
Team Mapping Method
193
IDEA MAPPING
194
Figure 9.1 Chapter 9 Summary
Bạn đang đọc truyện trên: Truyen247.Pro