Following are the judgements for all the nominated books of the genre "Best Chachaji's Role". Before we proceed further, we would like to thank Fad_mugs for giving unbiased judgements on time. The participants are requested not to unfollow either the community or the judge after the end of the awards as it was a permanent follow which was asked.

We hope that you are satisfied with the reviews and the judgements. Although we have made sure that no malpractice occurs, still if you feel any kind of biasness taking place, you are requested to politely ping us your doubt in the pm.

If you have any questions to be asked from the judge, i.e. Fad_mugs, you can politely comment down your doubts and tag her. She'll reply to your queries asap. Also, all the participants are requested to leave atleast one comment to acknowledge the review.

Before we begin with the reviews, here's a small note from your judge Fad_mugs, which we would really want you to read:
“Judging for this category of ‘Best Chachaji’s Role’ was a bit tough given all the good entries, that included a One-Shot, Short Stories and a Long Story. Please take note that the category of ‘Overall Opinion’ has been marked considering Chachaji/Anand’s prominence too, in addition to the one in ‘Plot and Concept’ category.
Congratulations to the Winner and Participants!!”

Many many congratulations to all the participants who came forward to showcase their talents. 🎉

Here you go with the reviews.

| W I N N E R |

As the number of entries were just 4, there is just one winner. And the winner for the Best Chachaji's Role is TANHAYEE... by Diku1302. Heartiest Congratulations to you for being a winner of the third edition of Suman- Ek Anokha Puruskaar.🥳

Here is the judgement of your Book:

NO. OF CHAPTERS READ: 5/5

COVER: (10/10)
• Creativity- (3/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
• Clarity of text- (2/2)

TITLE: (9/10)
• Uniqueness- (2/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/2)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
• Length- (1/1)

BLURB: (7.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (2.5/3)
• Insight into the book- (2/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1.5/2)
• Power to excite- (1.5/2)

PROLOGUE: (-/10)
Since there was no prologue, we haven't marked it, but it is highly suggested to construct and publish a nice prologue.

GRAMMAR: (9.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (2.5/3)
• Spellings- (3/3)
• Quality of sentences- (2/2)
• Punctuation- (2/2)

PLOT & CONCEPT: (7.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (2/3)
• Prominence of Chachaji- (2/3)
• Impact- (1.5/2)
• Execution- (2/2)

CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7.5/10)
• Character Sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3.5/4)
• Utilization or screen space of the characters- (4/4)

FLOW OF STORY: (9/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4.5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4.5/5)

OVERALL OPINION: (8.5/10)
The cover is really beautiful, it matches with the theme completely. Well done. Title is also relatable. Blurb is simple but it’s still good. A reader can decide to read the story due to multiple reasons mentioned in the blurb, which is actually a good thing, and one of the reasons can be to see how Naina is living a lonely life. But that particular part seems to be comparatively less explained in the story. Regarding the writing style, there seems to be a dominant usage of ‘&’ in sentences. ‘&’ is not used in general writing, it’s always ‘and’. There are certain rules for usage of ‘&’ in a sentence, which you can go through. Rest of the grammatical portion is fine. The plot is good, though it is somewhat inspired by the show. The long monologues in the form of catharsis and clarifications feel overstated and repetitive at times. The repetition could have been avoided. As I mentioned before, a glimpse of Naina’s current lonely life could have worked more, as the reader would feel more connected to her and then the impact of the reunion would be even greater. The twists and turns in the plot really surprise the reader, so kudos for that! The presence of Chachaji is not all over the storyline, but the prominence still makes an impact on the story and is one of the driving forces. Overall, a very well written and bounded story. Good work.

FOLLOW: (10/10)

TOTAL: 78.5/90 (87.22%)

| O T H E R |
| P A R T I C I P A N T S |

EVERESTing My Dream by pahul_gpk

NO. OF CHAPTERS READ: 10/10

COVER: (10/10)
• Creativity- (3/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
• Clarity of text- (2/2)

TITLE: (10/10)
• Uniqueness- (3/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/2)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
• Length- (1/1)

BLURB: (9/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (3/3)
• Insight into the book- (2.5/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1.5/2)
• Power to excite- (2/2)

PROLOGUE: (7/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (3/3)
• Insight into the book- (2/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1/2)
• Power to excite- (1/2)

GRAMMAR: (9.5/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (3/3)
• Spellings- (3/3)
• Quality of sentences- (1.5/2)
• Punctuation- (2/2)

PLOT & CONCEPT: (8.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (3/3)
• Prominence of Chachaji- (1.5/3)
• Impact- (2/2)
• Execution- (2/2)

CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7/10)
• Character Sketch- (2/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3/4)
• Utilization & screen space of the characters- (2/4)

FLOW OF STORY: (8/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (4/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4/5)

OVERALL OPINION: (7.5/10)
Superb work has been done on the cover of the book; the title chosen also suits the storyline perfectly. Kudos! Blurb appears to be a compilation of some excerpts from the story itself, but it still attracts the reader. The prologue again seems to repeat the pattern of the blurb, which later again seems to carry forward a little in the first chapter; whereas a Prologue should present something different from the main text or main plot, but still be a part of the story. A binge-reader may find the content repetitive from the Blurb, to Prologue to the First chapter. The plot is designed very nicely and it indeed makes you emotional. No flaws regarding the grammar and punctuation. Kudos! Prominence of Chachaji or Anand Aggarwal is good, but is in limited chapters. Also, the story solely focuses on Naina's journey, so there is not much scope for character development of other characters. Overall a very good story.

FOLLOW: (10/10)

TOTAL: 86.5/100 (86.5%)

*

THE WINGLESS BIRD from TALES OF IMMORTAL LOVE by Doraashi

NO. OF CHAPTERS READ: 1/1

COVER: (5.5/10)
• Creativity- (0.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
• Clarity of text- (0/2)

TITLE: (9.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (2.5/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (2/2)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
• Length- (1/1)

BLURB: (-/10)
Since it's an anthology, there was no specific blurb for this OS.

PROLOGUE: (-/10)
Since there was no prologue, we haven't marked it, but it is highly suggested to construct and publish a nice prologue.

GRAMMAR: (7/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (2.5/3)
• Spellings- (3/3)
• Quality of sentences- (1/2)
• Punctuation- (0.5/2)

PLOT & CONCEPT: (7/10)
• Uniqueness- (1/3)
• Prominence of Chachaji- (3/3)
• Impact- (1.5/2)
• Execution- (1.5/2)

CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (7/10)
• Character Sketch- (0/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3/4)
• Utilization or screen space of the characters- (4/4)

FLOW OF STORY: (7/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (3.5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (3.5/5)

OVERALL OPINION: (8.5/10)
Cover is good as a good thought is put behind choosing it; sets the tone of the story. But it’s still a plain image. Greater impact can be made with Naina's picture used with it, so that a reader gets to know about the protagonist instantly. Title is doing complete justice. Work needs to be done on punctuation throughout the chapter. Dialogues should be written under the double quotes; at some points, the identity of the speaker is unclear because of the mix-up of two dialogues. Usage of commas needs to be more prominent; there have been instances where a long sentence isn't understood just because of lack of commas and then it has to be re-read. So yes, editing is needed on this front. Sentence construction can be done better. Plot is more or less similar to the one in the show, but inclusion of the poem and Chachaji's realization was covered very nicely. I may not agree with Naina's opinion about Sharad's place being at her feet, but I respect a writer's choice. Since this story is under the category of ‘Best Role of Chachaji’, his prominence in the story and his impact on the storyline is high. So bonus marks for that. Overall a good read.

FOLLOW: (10/10)

TOTAL: 61.5/80 (76.875%)

*

Kaisi Yeh Baarishein by pahul_gpk

NO. OF CHAPTERS READ: All

COVER: (10/10)
• Creativity- (3/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (3/3)
• Clarity of graphics- (2/2)
• Clarity of text- (2/2)

TITLE: (8.5/10)
• Uniqueness- (2/3)
• Relatability with storyline- (1.5/2)
• Grammar or spellings- (2/2)
• Capitalisation- (2/2)
• Length- (1/1)

BLURB: (8.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (3/3)
• Insight into the book- (2/3)
• Writing style or flow- (1.5/2)
• Power to excite- (2/2)

PROLOGUE: (9.5/10)
• Grammar, spellings and punctuation- (3/3)
• Insight into the book- (2.5/3)
• Writing style or flow- (2/2)
• Power to excite- (2/2)

GRAMMAR: (8/10)
• Grammatical Portion- (2/3)
• Spellings- (3/3)
• Quality of sentences- (1/2)
• Punctuation- (2/2)

PLOT & CONCEPT: (6/10)
• Uniqueness- (2/3)
• Prominence of Chachaji- (1/3)
• Impact- (1.5/2)
• Execution- (1.5/2)

CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: (9/10)
• Character Sketch- (2/2)
• Introduction of characters between the storyline- (3/4)
• Utilization or screen space of the characters- (4/4)

FLOW OF STORY: (7.5/10)
• Connectivity of scenes- (3.5/5)
• Flow of sentences- (4/5)

OVERALL OPINION: (7/10)
The cover is very nicely designed, suits the story. Title is similar to the webseries, but still quite good. The blurb and prologue are indeed interesting. ‘His/her’ goof-ups found at maaannnyyyy places, can be corrected in editing. Sentence construction is good but could be done better, especially for long sentences. The main plot is the adaptation of the web-series 'Baarish' and a good amount of work seems to be done while adapting it into a Samaina Fiction. The Hindi used in the dialogues seems to be a little influenced by Punjabi at places. It's understandable, but it doesn't suit the Marwadi families residing in Mumbai. Regarding the connectivity of the scenes, the author has tried to adapt 'Parallel Editing' technique of filming in many scenarios, presenting parallel scenes in the narration. It's pretty impressive but it has its pros and cons when it comes to 'reading' it. Sometimes it creates interest, while sometimes it completely breaks the flow, making the reader disoriented for a moment due to the sudden shift. Prominence of Chachaji doesn’t seem to be that impactful as the whole storyline is concerned. Overall a good read.

FOLLOW: (10/10)

TOTAL: (84/100) 84%

❢◥ ▬▬▬▬▬▬ ◆ ▬▬▬▬▬▬ ◤❢

We, at FamiliaDeYUDKBH congratulate all the participants and the winner of Best Chachaji's Role and wish them a brighter future, both on Wattpad and in their lives.

The prizes would be distributed soon. Please check the chapter "Punctuality" to get the timeline of the awards.

Incase of any doubts from the admins, please pm, and incase of any doubts from the judge (Fad_mugs), please comment down and tag her.

Thankyou YUDKBHians.
We await your participation in the next edition as well.❤️